The
Milgram experiment was conducted in 1963 by Stanley Milgram at Yale University.
It focused on the conflict between obedience and inner morality. It aimed to
answer the question: “How long will a person continue to harm another so long
as they are told to do so?”
Milgram made an electric-shock generator with 30 switches. Each switch was labelled
clearly, evenly distributed between 15 and 450 volts, accompanied by the
intensity of the shock (Moderate to Strong to Severe to XXX). However, there
were no real shocks and the generator simply produced a sound.
Each
subject was told that their payment was just for showing up, and they could
keep the money regardless of what happened upon arrival.
The
subject met an Experimenter (who was leading the experiment) and another
subject who was actually a confederate (pretending to be a subject but really
in on it).
Both
subjects (real and confederate) drew
slips of paper to indicate who was going to be a Teacher and who was going to
be a Learner. This part was rigged so that the real subject would always be the
Teacher.
The
Teacher watched the Learner being strapped to a chair with electrodes attached.
The Teacher was then sent to a different room with the shock generator, unable
to see the Learner.
The Teacher
was told to teach pairs of words to the Learner. Whenever the Learner made a
mistake, the Teacher was told to punish the Learner by shocking them with a
higher voltage each time.
The
Learner was never actually shocked but rather each switch triggered a pre-taped
audio clip and sometimes the Learner would bang against the wall between the
two of them.
The
Experimenter, who was in the same room as the Teacher, would answer any
questions from the Teacher with set responses such as “Please continue”,
“Please go on” or “The experiment requires that you go on” or “You have no
other choice, you must go on”. This began with the mild responses and became
increasingly authoritarian for each time the Teacher contacted him.
If
the Teacher asked who was responsible if anything serious happened to the
Learner, the Experimenter replied, “I am responsible”. Most of the time this relived
the Teacher and they continued.
During
the experiment, many Teachers displayed signs of tension. Three Teachers
experienced “full-blown, uncontrollable seizures”. Despite being clearly
uncomfortable with what they were doing, all the Teachers obeyed up to 300
volts. 25 out of the 40 Teachers continued to shock the Learner until 450 Volts
Before
the experiment, it was estimated that about 3% of the subjects continue giving
shocks all the way. They believed that only psychopaths would go so far as to
do this.
However,
almost 65 % continued giving shocks. They didn’t even stop when the Learner
said he had heart-trouble. Ultimately, this suggests that in many situations we
simply act as an instrument and not as a person, obeying authority despite
conflict with our inner values.
Word
Count: 496
Milgram,
S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. Harpercollins.
Milgram,
S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social
Psychology, 67, 371-378.

No comments:
Post a Comment